I cringe whenever I see the words “brick wall” ever since
I read SOMETHING by SOMEONE who complained about the overuse or misuse of the
term. He argued that we should not consider the inability to find information a
“brick wall” unless we have done EVERYTHING possible to obtain that information
and failed. By his definition, the inability to push back another generation is
not a “brick wall” unless we went to the courthouse to obtain deeds and probate
records, contacted the funeral homes and cemeteries, scoured local newspapers,
and fleshed out collateral lines for clues. Not finding an answer on Ancestry
or FamilySearch does NOT a brick wall make. After reading that opinion, I try
to control my whining.
With that said, the research question that has given me
the most trouble and that deserves my attention before becoming a TRUE brick
walls is this:
WHO ARE THESE CHILDREN?
I know they were much loved by my great-grandmother Mary
Theresa Sheehan Killeen Walsh and her children because
- A family in New York gave Mary Theresa an album devoted solely to the children and their family.
- Mary Theresa’s oldest daughter Lillie went to New York when “John Jr” was born in 1917.
- There are photos of Lillie with the children taken over several years.
Lillie with John Jr and "Bob" |
Lillie and John Jr 1920 |
Lillie with John Jr. The children's home in Richmond Hill |
THE FACTS ARE THESE
With very few captions on the photos and without a last
name for the children, I have been stymied in my effort to learn more about the
family. The few facts that I am sure of are that John Jr was born in 1917,
sister “Bob” or “Bobie” or “Barbie” was born about 1919, they lived in Richmond
Hill, they visited a park in the Bronx, and they once had the whooping cough.
None of Mary Theresa's sisters had children as late as 1917.
THEORIES AND CONJECTURES
Probably the mystery children are the grandchildren of
one of Mary Theresa’s sisters or brothers. Since the older mystery child was
named “John Jr,” I looked at all of Mary Theresa’s nephews named John. The only
one old enough to have fathered a child in 1917 was the son of Mary Theresa’s
oldest sister Johanna Sheehan Hederman. However, in 1920, John Hederman was
living at home with his parents and was enumerated as Single.
Then I looked at Mary Theresa’s nieces who might have
married a man named John. Again the only possibility was Johanna’s daughter,
but her husband was named Charles, and they had only one child, a girl.
That leaves brothers Denis or John as a possible father
or grandfather. Denis did not immigrate to America but remained in Ireland. John’s
whereabouts are uncertain. Assuming that he immigrated to New York as his
sisters did, I have studied all the John Sheehans but could find no likely
candidate with a son and daughter born about 1917 and 1919.
So was he a grandfather? This man looks grandfatherly.
Was he John Sheehan?
In this next photo, there are two older women, the two mystery
children, and a young woman who looks the right age to be the mother of
children born in 1917 and 1919.
The poodle is Cutey; the children are "Bob" and John Jr. Who are the women? The woman in the middle appears to be the right age to be mother to the children. |
This photo appears to be showcasing the three
generations. Therefore, it seems possible that the young woman could be a
daughter of Mary Theresa’s brother John Sheehan.
Appears to be a 3-generation photo |
NEXT STEP
I will look for John Sheehans with a daughter old enough to marry a man named John and become a mother in 1917.
Amy Johnson Crow continues to challenge genealogy
bloggers and non-bloggers alike to think about our ancestors and share a story
or photo about them. The challenge is “52 Ancestors in 52 Weeks.”
Wendy
© 2019, Wendy Mathias. All rights reserved.
What about your grandmother's husband's family - nieces and nephews on his side?
ReplyDeleteThat's the thing - I don't know anything about his family. I THINK I found them in Norfolk but I'm not sure. If this is the right family, then they were not in New York.
DeleteWhat a mystery! I love looking at their clothing and also the setting of each picture.
ReplyDeleteYes, me too. That little girl's hat is so cute. And the grandfather with baby on a baby scale and that fern stand - I'd love to know where that picture was taken.
DeleteI hope this mystery of yours gets solved one day.
ReplyDeletebetty
Me too. I'm tired of worrying about it.
DeleteI'm glad that I'm not the only one crazy enough to try doing the 52 Ancestors and the A to Z Challenge at the same time. Good work on these mystery children.
ReplyDeleteMisery loves company!
DeleteWendy when you say "children's home" do you know it was a family home? My great grandfather s sisters were in a orphanage in Richmond on staten island
ReplyDeleteHA, when I wrote "children's home," it never occurred to me that it could be misinterpreted as an orphanage. But it is definitely their HOUSE as one photo is captioned "Our home in Richmond Hill."
DeleteI agree with SOMEONE who wrote there's no "Brick Wall". For me it's only the obstacle of (usually) time and/or money that is keeping me from getting to the resource I need to find more on an ancestor. Hopefully someday, you will cross something to help you confirm who these children are.
ReplyDeleteThat's it exactly for me too. Some places are not that far away but ....
DeleteWill the real parents of the mystery children please stand up?
ReplyDelete