Sepia Saturday challenges bloggers to share family history
through old photographs.
This week Sepia Saturday encourages all Homo-Sepians to
blog about those unidentified people in the photos passed down through the
generations. Does Alan think he’s being
funny? Being UNable to identify people
is my life! More often than not my blogs
are attempts to put names with those unnamed faces on cabinet cards and on wrinkled
or fading photos glued to brittle black pages of scrapbooks. In short, I got this.
While I have lots of photos to choose from, this one is
most similar to the prompt photo.
For a long time I was caught up in the notion that the photos
passed down in an old dress box had belonged to my great-grandmother Mary
Frances Jollett Davis. Every
unidentified face prompted me to compare pictures to those of known ancestors. If no match was apparent, I assumed the
person was some distant cousin, an aunt or uncle, or maybe even a neighbor.
Foolishly, I overlooked the idea that some old photos may
have come along with a marriage into my family, that these Great Unknowns were “the
outlaws,” as I like to call them: those
parents and siblings of the men and women who married into my family but whose
genealogy isn’t my concern.
So while this family is technically unknown to me, I do have
a guess: maybe my great-aunt Velma Davis
Woodring’s husband "Woody" as a child.
Does the boy look like he might have grown up to look like this?
Does the boy look like he might have grown up to look like this?
Or like this?
Unfortunately, anyone who knows the answer is long gone, so this family photo remains among “The Unknown.”
Please visit Sepia Saturday. It’s a virtual “Who’s Who” of “Who knows who.”
©
2014, Wendy Mathias. All rights reserved.
If only photographs could talk...
ReplyDeleteAmen!
DeleteIsn't it sad that so many photos go unidentified? Both of my grandmothers marked the back of many, many old photos. I'm so thankful that they took the time to do that.
ReplyDeleteIt is sad. How did you get so lucky to come from smart people?
DeleteAnother one in the 'guessing' game.
ReplyDeleteIt is a rather odd way to spend the morning - visiting people who share the same question: Who is this?
DeleteI have so many (too many) of the guessing photos. I blame myself for not asking the questions.
ReplyDeleteJoin the club!
DeleteI think the little boy looks like he could be Woody. Another mystery!
ReplyDeleteObviously, I think so too. But the parents don't look anything like some of the older people labeled as Velma's "in-laws."
DeleteI'm not sure about the second and third adult photo but the first one definitely looks like the little boy - the mouth is exactly the same. My mother would say "you can say it is whomever you want - no one will challenge you". Um, mom, that's not the point. ;-)
ReplyDeleteIt is tempting to write history, isn't it?
DeleteThanks for visiting and commenting upon my blog too. These pictures are great examples of "who can it be?" but they also have another theme...what was going on at that time in these folks lives? I think that mother in the top photo was none to eager for the sitting, or perhaps she sat on something that made her look like that? No question the last photo is of joy!
ReplyDeleteYeah, Mom looks like a tough one. Dad looks like he could have been the poster boy for henpecked husbands.
DeleteI think the first Woody looks so much like the young boy in the unknown photo. Have you tried facial recognition to see if they come up as possibilities? Picasa does a pretty good job, considering it is free. It was pretty accurate with my family photos even going from child to adulthood. But it did tend to mix up first cousins and mother/daughter sometimes. And it can never seem to identify babies! Even if you don't find the missing names, the photo is a wonderful keepsake.
ReplyDeleteI have never done facial recognition nor do I know anything about how it works. Good - something else to consider and play with!
DeleteIt really isn't easy to tell what years do to people as they grow up and grow old... I have a lot of questionmarks in my old family albums too.
ReplyDeleteTrying to match photos of young and old people is really a game with no end, it seems.
DeleteI think the little boy is Woody. The woman looks too old to be his mother though...and I agree she looks very unhappy. At last, you've found a decent name for those family-by-marriage folks. Outlaws is perfect!
ReplyDeleteHmm, grandparents - now that's a thought.
DeleteIt's Woody with his grandparents. Did you make up the name "Woody" or is that actually a person?
ReplyDeleteYes, Woody was his nickname. Arthur Henry Woodring was the official name.
DeleteLike Debi said, the boy in the first photo does look similar to the little boy in the group photo.
ReplyDeleteIsn't it interesting how everyone's expressions are different in that group photo? The little guy looks a bit surprised with raised eyebrows, the man looks like a gentle, long-suffering soul and the woman looks just a wee bit perturbed.
You described them perfectly! I always feel sympathetic when I look at that man.
DeleteI'm in the minority. I don't think the boy in the first photo looks like Woody.
ReplyDeleteBut oh that woman. She looks so much older than the man. Poor guy.
Nancy
Well, that's ok if you disagree. That will keep me from blindly assuming I'm correct.
DeleteI like to think it might have been the 1929 photo. Such a happy face in the fishing photo.
ReplyDeleteI never knew Woody, but he was my mother's favorite uncle. She always thought he and Velma were lots of fun.
DeleteTry facial recognition. If you have a Mac, iPhoto does a reasonable job - the more photos you identify, the better it gets. Otherwise Picasa. This can be a lot of fun as it matches up today's faces with those of the past.
ReplyDeleteCould your photo be of three generations? Mother, son (or son in law) and his son - maybe the stern and sad looks are following the death of the wife/daughter?
Isn't it fun speculating?
I had not thought of 3 generations. Interesting.
DeleteI think it looks like the same person. Have you tried overlaying the photos in photoshop? I have been told that the positioning of nose, eyes and ears doesn't change over time so this will give a good indication.
ReplyDeleteI just got Photoshop for Christmas and haven't played enough to do that. It sounds like a good idea - I need to look for some tutorials, I guess.
DeleteI think they could be the same person.
ReplyDeletePoor Nancy is quickly becoming a party of 1 since she seems to be the lone dissenter at this point.
Deleteyes,i think Woody 1929 looks similar to the boy in the family portrait.If so, he seems to have grown happier as he grew older!
ReplyDeleteIn both pictures, there is some thick hair.
DeleteI am proud to be a fellow Homo-Sepian of yours, Wendy, lol. I can't believe how unhappy the three look in that first picture. The father looks a bit apologetic, maybe it was his idea to have the picture taken and the mother vehemently objected and there was a big fight, but they did it anyway.
ReplyDeleteThe boy sure could have been Woody. He sure did fill out by the time he went fishing, didn't he?
What a great post, as always.
Kathy M.
If you guessed that Woody became diabetic, you'd be right. He was indeed a chunk, judging by all the photos I've seen.
DeleteI haven't finished reading everyone's postings for this Sepian weekend, but I will say now that your Unknown trio is my favorite with the most perfect fit and the most witty story.
ReplyDeleteI have used the overlay method and it sort of works, but really only for elimination rather than matching. It's harder with children and adult faces. My own face at age 7 is quite different from age 21. And I would be startled to see the face under this beard now.
If by the time you finish visiting everyone my post is no longer your favorite, don't tell me. I prefer to keep basking in the glow of that compliment.
DeleteHa! Ha! I would love to hear those (well all of yours) talk! You made my Sepia Saturday reading morning again, from the first line! I do believe that Alan is chuckling too- even from across that big wide pond that separates him from us over here! You are a photo-finding-Goddess!
ReplyDeleteWell there appears to be a resemblance.Why don't we all just suspend disbelief and and say that it is! For a few brief seconds that we choose we have identified an unknown! Woody seems to be very jolly character anyway!
ReplyDeleteI'm not going to hate on the woman in the photo..... I've got some "greats" in my family whose pictures make them look like you'd better run for your life. She looks pretty friendly by comparison.
ReplyDeleteYou raise a good point about photographs in family collections being possibly derived from families further removed than immediate ancestors. That is why it is so important to document the provence of groups of photographs when they are added to collections.
ReplyDeleteSorry, provence = provenance
DeleteI think you're right. I do not know how he looks so jolly when his mother makes deadly Earnest look positively flippant.
ReplyDeleteI like "deadly Earnest" as a name for my unknown.
DeleteYes, I thought this would be a perfect theme for you. I love the idea of "outlaws" and your theory about how they come into our collections. As for your "Who did he become" question, it's time to bring out the facial recognition software.
ReplyDeleteI need to read up on how that facial recognition stuff works.
DeleteGreat photo Wendy, and wise words to remember those photos might come from outlaws or friends or....
ReplyDeleteRight - and pity the descendants of our Sepia Saturday friends who rescue orphan photos. But I'm sure they're smart enough to label which ones are family and which are "orphans."
DeleteThe eyelids and the shape of the mouth seem just right.
ReplyDeleteIn this first picture, wouldn't he be with his grandparents?!?
:)~
HUGZ
That's a possibility. But I know nothing.
DeleteIt is ssuch a striking, but sad family group that raises so many questions. As others have pointed out, the woman looks very unhappy, but life was hard for women then especially if she had to contend with many pregnancies. Could Woody be a late child? He has a startled look abut him, whilst the father has an anguished look. You could weave a story from this single photograph. Good luck with your research.
ReplyDeleteSearching for Woody. I think you have the making of a whole new blog!
ReplyDeleteHe does look like the same fellow between the first and second photos.