Randy Seaver of Genea-Musings has proposed a methodology for comparing how
Ancestry.com and FamilySearch.org are doing at compiling an index for the 1940
US Census. You can read the full
description at his website HERE, but basically the
steps are these:
1. Select
one name and one state.
2. Create
a chart and list all the names from Ancestry.
Note the birth year and state.
3. In
a new column on the same chart, record findings from FamilySearch noting
whether the information is the same or different. If a name does not appear at all, put an X.
4. If
names from one index do not appear on the other, then your next step is to find
them. Likely the name is entered in a
different form.
Randy’s latest project piqued my interest right away
because I just recently experienced the kind of problem presented in #4. I had looked on Ancestry for my great-aunt
Mae Holland in order to feature her family for my Census Sunday series. She wasn’t there. When I looked in FamilySearch’s index, I
found her right away.
As soon as I saw the enumerator’s handwriting, I guessed
correctly that Ancestry had her indexed as Halland rather than Holland.
So, I decided to follow Randy’s lead and look at some
more names. I started with Jollett in
Virginia because I knew there would not be very many. Here is my chart:
Both FamilySearch and Ancestry listed the same names, but
not in the same order. Ancestry lists by
birthdate while FamilySearch lists by county or enumeration district. There are only 2 differences.
Ancestry indexed Nannie V but FamilySearch says Nancy
V. Actually, Nannie V is correct. But had I been indexing this page and not
been a descendent, I would probably have said Nancy too. I have to give my vote to Ancestry knowing it
IS correct even though it doesn’t LOOK correct.
The other difference is Ann from Ancestry and Anne from
FamilySearch. It looks like Anne to me. My vote goes to FamilySearch.
But what really surprises me – in a GOOD way – is that
Ancestry and FamilySearch were both able to get Jollett from the poor
handwriting of Mrs. Kate McLean, the enumerator.
She didn’t do anybody any favors.
Based on this one search, the vote for the Next Index Star
is tied.
Wow! Interesting findings Wendy!
ReplyDeleteThat's very interesting! That's how we ended up with a Humpton in Lucy's household instead of a Thornton. I was so glad to find out that noone in my family actually named a child Humpton.
ReplyDeleteI've always had an interest in tracing my family lineage, but, quite honestly, I don't know where to squeeze in another 5 minutes in the day. I know it must be fun, even exciting. Have a blast. I will get to it one day, I promise.
ReplyDelete